Up-611/04

As the courts did not explain why the press conferences which also took place in September were not sufficient enough reason for the complainant to operate his on-site bar, the complainant’s right to the equal protection of rights determined in Article 22 of the Constitution was violated. From the aforementioned right there namely follows the obligation of courts to adopt a position in the reasoning of their decisions regarding the allegations of parties if they are admissible and important for a decision.