Reference no.: |
Up-2073/06 |
Objavljeno: |
Official Gazette RS, No. 14/2007 and OdlUS XVI, 36 | 25.01.2007 |
ECLI: |
ECLI:SI:USRS:2007:Up.2073.06 |
Abstract: |
It follows from the challenged orders that the courts established and stated those concrete circumstances from which it is possible to make a substantiated conclusion based on life experience that there existed a real danger that the defendant would repeat the alleged criminal offence.
The evaluation that there existed the absolute necessity of the additional duration of detention for reasons of public safety is indeed briefly reasoned in the challenged orders, however, it is evident from the reasoning that in considering the case the courts did consider the principle of proportionality. |
Document in PDF: |
|
Type of procedure: |
constitutional complaint |
Type of act: |
individual act |
Date of application: |
30.10.2006 |
Date of decision: |
25.01.2007 |
Type of decision adopted: |
decision |
Outcome of proceedings: |
dismissal |
Document: |
AN02963 |