Up-719/06

Reference no.:
Up-719/06
Objavljeno:
Official Gazette RS, No 61/2007 and OdlUS XVI, 96 | 14.06.2007
ECLI:
ECLI:SI:USRS:2007:Up.719.06
Abstract:
Due to the fact that the Supreme Court rejected a revision requested by the complainants because such was filed by the complainants and not by their attorney, without instructing them (in accordance with the principle of providing assistance to legally untrained parties) of such procedural restriction or of its legal consequences prior to issuing a decision, the complainants’ right to access to court determined in the first paragraph of Article 23 of the Constitution was violated.
Document in PDF:
Type of procedure:
constitutional complaint
Type of act:
individual act
Date of application:
12.06.2006
Date of decision:
14.06.2007
Type of decision adopted:
decision
Outcome of proceedings:
annulment or annulment ab initio
Document:
AN03012