Reference no.: |
Up-719/06 |
Objavljeno: |
Official Gazette RS, No 61/2007 and OdlUS XVI, 96 | 14.06.2007 |
ECLI: |
ECLI:SI:USRS:2007:Up.719.06 |
Abstract: |
Due to the fact that the Supreme Court rejected a revision requested by the complainants because such was filed by the complainants and not by their attorney, without instructing them (in accordance with the principle of providing assistance to legally untrained parties) of such procedural restriction or of its legal consequences prior to issuing a decision, the complainants’ right to access to court determined in the first paragraph of Article 23 of the Constitution was violated. |
Document in PDF: |
|
Type of procedure: |
constitutional complaint |
Type of act: |
individual act |
Date of application: |
12.06.2006 |
Date of decision: |
14.06.2007 |
Type of decision adopted: |
decision |
Outcome of proceedings: |
annulment or annulment ab initio |
Document: |
AN03012 |