U-I-160/10

Reference no.:
U-I-160/10
ECLI:
ECLI:SI:USRS:2011:U.I.160.10
Abstract:
Due to the fact that the municipality did not conclude a legal transaction to acquire land from the petitioner, and the fact that an expropriation procedure was not carried out, the Ordinance on Categorization is inconsistent with Article 19 of the Act Amending Public Roads Act and Article 69 of the Constitution inasmuch as it categorizes a road on her land as a public road. As the Ordinance in this part inadmissibly interferes with her property rights, it is also inconsistent with Article 33 of the Constitution.
Document in PDF:
Type of procedure:
review of constitutionality and legality of regulations and other general acts
Type of act:
municipal regulation
Date of application:
06.07.2010
Date of decision:
06.07.2011
Type of decision adopted:
decision
Outcome of proceedings:
annulment or annulment ab initio
Document:
AN03541