U-I-213/16

Opravilna št.:
U-I-213/16
Evidenčni stavek:
Due to the fact that the municipality did not conclude a legal transaction to acquire land from the petitioners, and the fact that an expropriation procedure was not carried out against them, Article 8 of the Ordinance on Categorisation is inconsistent with Article 69 of the Constitution inasmuch as it categorises a path on their land as a public path. As Article 8 of the Ordinance on Categorisation in this part inadmissibly interferes with the property right, it is also inconsistent with Article 33 of the Constitution. 
Dokument v PDF obliki:
Vrsta zadeve:
review of constitutionality and legality of regulations and other general acts
Vrsta akta:
municipal regulation
Vlagatelj:
Uroš Špenko, Smlednik
Datum vloge:
23.11.2016
Datum odločitve:
09.01.2020
Vrsta odločitve:
decision
Vrsta rešitve:
annulment or annulment ab initio other resolutions
Dokument:
AN03964