U-I-93/91

Opravilna št.:
U-I-93/91
Objavljeno:
OdlUS I, 8 | 13.02.1992
ECLI:
ECLI:SI:USRS:1992:U.I.93.91
Akt:
Ordinance by the Municipal Assembly of Tržič on Land Use in the Municipality of Tržič (Official Gazette of Gorenjsko, No. 12/86), Art. 34
Izrek:
The initiative for evaluation of the constitutionality and legality of the impugned provision of the Ordinance has not been accepted.
Evidenčni stavek:
The Constitutional Court did not accept the initiative for evaluation of legality because the initiator did not show a proper legal interest.
Geslo:
Proper legal interest as a procedural requirement in the constitutional court procedure (Art. 162, Para 2 of the Constitution of RS).
Pravna podlaga:
Člen . Ustava [URS] Člen . Zakon o Ustavnem sodišču [ZUstS]
Dokument v PDF obliki:
Polno besedilo:
U-I-93/91
13/2-1992
 
 
R E S O L U T I O N
 
At the meeting on Feb. 13, 1992, the Constitutional Court discussed the initiative filed by Rajko Premrl, Tržič
 
and p a s s e d t h e f o l l o w i n g r e s o l u t i o n :
 
The Constitutional Court refuses to accept the initiative and will not institute the proceedings of evaluation of legality of Art. 34 of the Ordinance passed by the Municipal Assembly of Tržič on Land Use in the Municipality of Tržič (Official Gazette of Gorenjsko, No. 12/86).
 
R e a s o n s
 
On Oct. 28, 1991, the citizen filed the initiative for evaluation of the legality of the provision of the municipal Ordinance mentioned above. On Dec. 23, 1991, the Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia proclaimed the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia which, in its Art. 162, Para 2, provides that anybody may initiate proceedings if he shows a proper legal interest.
 
On Jan. 20, 1992 the initiator stated in writing that his legal interest was substantiated by the use of the impugned Art. 34 of the Ordinance which eliminates citizens from the procedure of adoption of implementory regulations in regional planning.
 
The Constitutional Court declares that the initiator did not succeed in showing a proper legal interest later on, thus failing to fulfill the procedural condition for instituting the proceedings as determined by the Constitution. Therefore, based on Art. 25, Para 2 of the Law on the Procedure of the Constitutional Court of Slovenia (Official Gazette of SRS, No. 39/74 and 28/76) in combination with Art. 7 of the Enabling Statute for the Implementation of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia (Official Gazette of RS, No. 33/91-I), the Constitutional Court resolved as above.
 
 
P r e s i d e n t :
Peter Jambrek, PhD.
Vrsta zadeve:
review of constitutionality and legality of regulations and other general acts
Vrsta akta:
municipal regulation
Vlagatelj:
Rajko Premrl, Tržič
Datum vloge:
28.10.1991
Datum odločitve:
13.02.1992
Vrsta odločitve:
ruling
Vrsta rešitve:
non-acceptance of petition
Dokument:
AN00052